九章共引 213 条次，去重后 205 条（中文 6 · 西文 199）。条目末方括号内为引用该条的章号。第十至十四章新引的文献并入本表。
关于本表的一条说明：被两章共同引用的只有 8 条，被三章以上共同引用的一条也没有。这个分布只支持“输入不同”，不支持“产出不同”——九章完全可以从九个不重叠的书架出发，最后说同一句话。判断九章是否真正独立，看的是第十章那条读数相关的合并规则，不是本表。
1. Aida, T., Meijer, E. W., & Stupp, S. I. (2012). Functional supramolecular polymers. Science, 335, 813–817. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1205962. [4]
2. Alzi’abi, S. E. (2026). Prosodic encoding and second-language lexical learning. Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amag062 [2]
3. Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., Jones, R. L., Clark, V. A semantics-based approach to the no-negative-evidence problem. Cognitive Science, 2009, 33:1301–1316. [6]
4. Ambrish, I. Does Children’s Developing Understanding of Linguistic Register Impact Their Social Preferences? Social Development, 2025. [9]
5. Anderson, J. R. Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 1982, 89(4): 369–406. [3]
6. Arnett, C., Chang, T. A., Michaelov, J. A., & Bergen, B. K. (2025). On the Acquisition of Shared Grammatical Representations in Bilingual Language Models. Proceedings of ACL 2025, 20707-20726. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1010. [3]
7. Arnon, I., & Christiansen, M. H. (2017). The Role of Multiword Building Blocks in Explaining L1–L2 Differences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9, 621–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12271. [4]
8. Ashwell, L. (2014). The Metaphysics of Desire and Dispositions. Philosophy Compass, 9(7), 469–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12143. [4]
9. Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press, 1962. [5]
10. Avery, N., & Marsden, E. A meta-analysis of sensitivity to grammatical information during self-paced reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 1055–1087, 2019. [7]
11. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic versus grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 32(2), 233–259. [1]
12. Barker, E., Chen, L., Cooper, D., Moody, D., Regenscheid, A., Souppaya, M., Newhouse, W., Housley, R., Turner, S., Barker, W., & Kent, K. (2025). Considerations for Achieving Crypto Agility: Strategies and Practices. NIST CSWP 39. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.CSWP.39 [2]
13. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173–1182. [2]
14. Beckner, C., & Bybee, J. (2009). A usage-based account of constituency and reanalysis. Language Learning, 59(s1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00534.x. [4]
15. Bieber, R. E., Gordon-Salant, S. Influence of talker and accent variability on rapid adaptation and generalization to non-native accented speech in younger and older adults. Auditory Perception & Cognition, 2024, 7(2):110–139. [9]
16. Bobrow, S. A., & Bell, S. M. (1973). On catching on to idiomatic expressions. Memory & Cognition, 1(3), 343–346. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198118. [4]
17. Boyd, J. K., Goldberg, A. E. Learning what not to say: The role of statistical preemption and categorization in a-adjective production. Language, 2011, 87(1):55–83. DOI:10.1353/lan.2011.0012. [6]
18. Buttazzo, G. C. Hard Real-Time Computing Systems. Springer, 3rd ed., 2011. [7]
19. Bybee, J. (2010). Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge University Press. [4]
20. Bybee, J. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge University Press, 2010. [4、9]
21. Cabrelli, J., Cruz, J., Escalante Martínez, J., Finestrat, I., & Luque, A. (2026). From L2 acquisition to L1 restructuring: phonotactics in perception and production. Frontiers in Language Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3389/flang.2025.1603764. [3]
22. Cahill, D. G., et al. (2014). Nanoscale thermal transport. Applied Physics Reviews, 1, 011305. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4832615. [3]
23. Chen, T., Kornblith, S., Norouzi, M., & Hinton, G. (2020). A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations. ICML, PMLR 119, 1597-1607. [3]
24. Chetty, R., Jackson, M. O., Kuchler, T., et al. (2022). Social capital I: Measurement and associations with economic mobility. Nature, 608, 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04996-4 [1]
25. Chisholm, R. (1976). Person and Object. Open Court. [4]
26. Chiu, S. L., Toscano, C. M., Toscano, J. C., & McMurray, B. (2025). Listeners rapidly adapt to current conditions: “Good-enough” adaptation in multitalker speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 154(11), 3162–3194. doi:10.1037/xge0001797. [8]
27. Chiu, S. L., Toscano, C. M., Toscano, J. C., McMurray, B. Listeners rapidly adapt to current conditions: “Good-enough” adaptation in multitalker speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2025, 154(11):3162–3194. [9]
28. Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of B. F. Skinner, Verbal Behavior. Language, 35(1), 26–58. [1]
29. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press. [3]
30. Christiansen, M. H., & Arnon, I. (2017). More Than Words: The Role of Multiword Sequences in Language Learning and Use. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(3), 542–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12274. [4]
31. Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(1). [2]
32. Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure. (2025). Global Infrastructure Resilience Report 2025. [2]
33. Coetzee, A. W., Henriksen, N., & García-Amaya, L. (2025). Cross-language interactions of phonetic and phonological processes: Intervocalic plosive lenition in Afrikaans-Spanish bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 47(1), 257–281. doi:10.1017/S0272263124000731. [8]
34. Cognetta, M., & Okazaki, N. (2025). Tokenization as Finite-State Transduction. Computational Linguistics, 51(4). [4]
35. Collide Paradigm Skill. (2026-08-04).本书的方法internal method specification supplied by the user. [1]
36. Corbett, P. T., et al. (2006). Dynamic combinatorial chemistry. Chemical Reviews, 106, 3652–3711. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020452p. [4]
37. Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 5(4), 161–170. [8]
38. Corder, S. P. The Significance of Learners’ Errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 1967, 5:161–170. [9]
39. Cozzo, E., Baños, R. A., Meloni, S., et al. (2013). Contact-based social contagion in multiplex networks. Physical Review E, 88, 050801. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.88.050801 [1]
40. De Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7–21. [1、3]
41. De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6, 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9 [1]
42. DeKeyser, R. (ed.) Practice in a Second Language: Perspectives from Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology. Cambridge University Press, 2007. [2]
43. DeKeyser, R. Skill acquisition theory. In VanPatten & Williams (Eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition. Routledge, 2007. [7]
44. Dean, C. D. et al. The structure of the end-Cretaceous dinosaur fossil record in North America. Current Biology, 2025, 35(9):1973–1988.e6. DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2025.03.025. [6]
45. Della Libera, L., Paissan, F., Subakan, C., & Ravanelli, M. (2025). FocalCodec: Low-Bitrate Speech Coding via Focal Modulation Networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 38. [2]
46. Dupre, G. (2024). Acquiring a language vs. inducing a grammar. Cognition, 247, 105771. [4]
47. Ellis, N. C. Usage-based and form-focused accounts of second language acquisition: the associative learning tradition. In: related SLA work, 2000s–2020s. [9]
48. Ellis, N. C., & Sagarra, N. Learned attention in adult language acquisition. Language Learning, 60, 264–273, 2010. [7]
49. Ellis, R. Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: a psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2005, 27(2): 141–172. [5、7]
50. Erlam, R. Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 implicit knowledge: an empirical validation study. Applied Linguistics, 2006, 27(3): 464–491. [5]
51. Estaji, M., & Kardoust, A. (2024). Transfer of responsibility in novice and experienced Iranian EFL teachers’ scaffolding: interactional characteristics. Instructional Science, 52, 975–995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-024-09682-8 [1]
52. Fan, K., & Wang, H. (2024). The productive processing of formulaic sequences by second language learners in writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1281926. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1281926. [4]
53. Feher, D., Vulić, I., & Minixhofer, B. (2025). Retrofitting Large Language Models with Dynamic Tokenization. ACL 2025, 29866–29883. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1444. [4]
54. Ferreira, F., & Patson, N. D. The good enough approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 71–83, 2007. [7]
55. Fichtner, F., Barcroft, J., Sommers, M., & Olejarczuk, P. (2025). Effects of Sociophonetic Variability on L2 Vocabulary Learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 47(4), 1071–1095. doi:10.1017/S0272263125100648. [8]
56. Franco, A., Malhotra, N., Simonovits, G. Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 2014, 345(6203):1502–1505. DOI:10.1126/science.1255484. [6]
57. Fridman, C., Meir, N., & Marian, V. (2026). Parallel activation of multiple languages in trilinguals: Evidence from eye movements and individual differences. Applied Psycholinguistics. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716426100733. [3]
58. Fu, K., Zhao, Y., & Liu, G. (2024). Pathway-directed recyclable chirality inversion of coordinated supramolecular polymers. Nature Communications, 15, 9571. [4]
59. Gangopadhyay, I., Kaushanskaya, M. The effect of speaker reliability on word learning in monolingual and bilingual children. Cognitive Development, 2022, 64:101252. [9]
60. Gangopadhyay, I., Peters, L. The effect of speaker reliability on word learning in children: a replication study. Frontiers in Developmental Psychology, 2025, 3:1469550. [9]
61. Gao, Z., et al. (2024). A coopetition-driven strategy for metastable supramolecular polymerization under kinetic control. Nature Communications, 15, 10762. [4]
62. Gershman, S. J., & Niv, Y. Learning latent structure: carving nature at its joints. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2010, 20(2): 251–256. [8]
63. Gershman, S. J., Blei, D. M., & Niv, Y. Context, learning, and extinction. Psychological Review, 2010, 117(1): 197–209. [8]
64. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin. [1]
65. Gil, K.-H. (2026). Restructuring vs. development: When typological closeness does not facilitate L2 acquisition. Second Language Research, 42(2), 221-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583251389463. [3]
66. Godfroid, A., Loewen, S., Jung, S., Park, J.-H., Gass, S., & Ellis, R. Timed and untimed grammaticality judgments measure distinct types of knowledge: Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 269–297, 2015. [7]
67. Gold, E. M. Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 1967, 10:447–474. [6]
68. Goldberg, A. E. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford University Press, 2006. [6]
69. Goldberg, A. E. Partial productivity of linguistic constructions: Dynamic categorization and statistical preemption. Language and Cognition, 2016. [6]
70. Goldstone, R. L. (2000). Unitization during category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(1), 86–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.26.1.86. [4]
71. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. [1]
72. Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728998000133 [2]
73. Guo, D., Wu, J., Yiu, S. M. Do Language Models Know What Not to Say? Causal Evidence for Statistical Preemption in LLMs. arXiv:2605.23039, 2026. [preprint] [6]
74. HamediRad, M., et al. (2018). Automated Design-Build-Test-Learn pipeline for enhanced microbial production. Communications Biology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-018-0076-9. [3]
75. Han, C., & Liu, Y. (2026). Individual Network of Linguistic Practice (INoLP): Quantifying social networks and pragmatic competence of international students during their sojourn abroad. Applied Linguistics, amag024. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amag024 [1]
76. Hartsuiker, R. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. Error monitoring in speech production: a computational test of the perceptual loop theory. Cognitive Psychology, 2001, 42(2): 113–157. [7]
77. Hauser, H., Ijspeert, A. J., Füchslin, R. M., Pfeifer, R., & Maass, W. (2012). Towards a theoretical foundation for morphological computation. Biological Cybernetics, 105, 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-012-0471-0 [1]
78. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016). Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. CVPR, 770-778. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.90. [3]
79. Hsu, A., Griffiths, T. L. Sampling assumptions affect use of indirect negative evidence in language learning. PLoS ONE, 2016, 11(6):e0156597. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0156597. [6]
80. Hu, W., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Code-switching costs from Chinese-English relative clauses processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1144530. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1144530 [2]
81. Huber, P. J. Robust Estimation of a Location Parameter. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1964, 35(1):73–101. [9]
82. Hudgens, M. G., & Halloran, M. E. (2008). Toward causal inference with interference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(482), 832–842. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214508000000292 [1]
83. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press. [1]
84. IEEE Technology Navigator. Real-time systems. 2026. https://technav.ieee.org/topic/real-time-systems/ [7]
85. Imai, K., Keele, L., & Yamamoto, T. (2010). Identification, inference and sensitivity analysis for causal mediation effects. Statistical Science, 25(1), 51–71. [2]
86. Ishihara, T., & Hamada, A. Evaluating the validity of web-based reaction-time tasks for assessing L2 grammatical knowledge in young learners. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 4(3), 100228, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100228. [7]
87. Jenkinson, H. A Manual of Archive Administration. 1922. [9]
88. Ji, J., Liu, W., Li, J., Yang, X., & Peng, G. (2026). Integrating syntactic and prosodic boundary cues in second language processing: Evidence from L1-Chinese L2-English learners and L1 English speakers. Second Language Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583261445731. [3]
89. Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228–238, 1982. [7]
90. Karimi, H., & Ferreira, F. Good-enough language processing: current evidence and open questions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2024. [7]
91. Karst, D. J., et al. (2018). Integrated continuous biopharmaceutical manufacturing: scientific and regulatory landscape. Trends in Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.08.008. [3]
92. Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 15. [8]
93. Kim, J.-e., & Nam, H. Measures of implicit knowledge revisited: Processing modes, time pressure, and modality. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2016. [7]
94. Kim, K. M. H., & Godfroid, A. (2023). The interface of explicit and implicit second-language knowledge: A longitudinal study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 26(4), 709–723. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728922000773 [2]
95. Kleinschmidt, D. F., & Jaeger, T. F. (2015). Robust speech perception: Recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel. Psychological Review, 122(2), 148–203. doi:10.1037/a0038695. [8]
96. Kleinschmidt, D. F., Jaeger, T. F. Robust Speech Perception: Recognize the Familiar, Generalize to the Similar, and Adapt to the Novel. Psychological Review, 2015, 122(2):148–203. [9]
97. Koenig, M. A., Harris, P. L. Preschoolers Mistrust Ignorant and Inaccurate Speakers. Child Development, 2005, 76(6):1261–1277. [9]
98. Korevaar, P. A., et al. (2012). Pathway complexity in supramolecular polymerization. Nature, 481, 492–496. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10720. [4]
99. Kormos, J. (2006). Speech Production and Second Language Acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum. [3]
100. Krashen, S. D. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Pergamon, 1982. [5、7]
101. Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 149–174. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1008 [2]
102. Kuhl, P. K., Tsao, F.-M., & Liu, H.-M. (2003). Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(15), 9096–9101. [1]
103. Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. Prediction as probabilistic pre-activation at multiple representational levels. 2016. [7]
104. Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31, 32–59, 2016. [7]
105. Labov, W. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. 1966; Sociolinguistic Patterns. 1972. [9]
106. Larsen-Freeman, D. Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 1997, 18(2): 141–165. [1]
107. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press. [1]
108. Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological Foundations of Language. Wiley. [1]
109. Levelt, W. J. M. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. MIT Press, 1989. [7]
110. Li, C., & Sui, M. (2025). The relationship between complexity, accuracy and fluency in L2 English speech: Individual differences and dynamic patterns. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 15(3), 501-532. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.28006. [3]
111. Liu, C. L., & Layland, J. W. Scheduling algorithms for multiprogramming in a hard-real-time environment. Journal of the ACM, 20, 46–61, 1973. [7]
112. Liu, W., et al. (2025). Analyzing and Mitigating Inconsistency in Discrete Speech Tokens for Neural Codec Language Models. Proceedings of ACL 2025. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1498 [2]
113. Liu, X., et al. (2026). Lexical representations in bilingual language processing. Neurobiology of Language, 7. https://doi.org/10.1162/NOL.a.255 [2]
114. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Academic Press. [1]
115. Metta, G., Natale, L., Nori, F., et al. (2010). The iCub humanoid robot: An open-systems platform for research in cognitive development. Neural Networks, 23(8–9), 1125–1134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2010.08.010 [1]
116. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158. [4]
117. National Archives and Records Administration. Digital Preservation Program. 2025–2026. [9]
118. Nieuwland, M. S., et al. Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension. eLife, 7, e33468, 2018. [7]
119. Nissen, S. B., Magidson, T., Gross, K., Bergstrom, C. T. Publication bias and the canonization of false facts. eLife, 2016, 5:e21451. [6]
120. Nozari, N. Monitoring, control and repair in word production. Nature Reviews Psychology, 4, 222–238, 2025. doi:10.1038/s44159-025-00417-1. [7]
121. Nozari, N., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. Is comprehension necessary for error detection? A conflict-based account of monitoring in speech production. Cognitive Psychology, 63, 1–33, 2011. [7]
122. OECD. Adverse Outcome Pathways. OECD Chemical Safety and Biosafety programme. [9]
123. OECD. Guidance Document for the Scientific Review of Adverse Outcome Pathways. OECD Series on Testing and Assessment No. 344, 2021. [9]
124. OECD. Guidance on Grouping of Chemicals, Third Edition. OECD Series on Testing and Assessment No. 418, 2025. [9]
125. Open Science Framework. Park & Kim 2025 data and analysis scripts: OSF project hge2x (as reported by the article). [7]
126. Pagnoni, A., et al. (2025). Byte Latent Transformer: Patches Scale Better Than Tokens. Proceedings of ACL 2025, 9238–9258. [4]
127. Park, S. H., & Kim, H. (2025). Interface challenges in online processing: The role of crosslinguistic influence in L2 sentence comprehension. Language and Cognition. [2、3]
128. Park, S. H., & Kim, H. Interface challenges in online processing: the role of crosslinguistic influence in L2 sentence comprehension. Language and Cognition, 17, e63, 2025. doi:10.1017/langcog.2025.10026. [7]
129. Pashler, H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 1994, 116(2): 220–244. [3]
130. Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Regier, T. The learnability of abstract syntactic principles. Cognition, 2011, 118(3): 306–338. [6]
131. Perkins, L., & Hunter, T. (2026). Modeling regularization in language acquisition as noise-tolerant grammar selection. Cognition, 268, 106352. [4、8]
132. Peters, A. M. The Units of Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press, 1983. [4]
133. Pienemann, M., Lenzing, A., & Nicholas, H. (2024). Can dynamical systems theory be applied to second language acquisition? The issues of reductionism and intentionality. Second Language Research, 40(4), 1009–1029. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583241229280 [1]
134. Pinker, S. Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure. MIT Press, 1989. [6]
135. Postma, A. Detection of errors during speech production: A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77, 97–132, 2000. [7]
136. Prabhakaran, S., et al. 2026 Guideline for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke, 2026. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000513. [7]
137. Qian, T., Jaeger, T. F., & Aslin, R. N. Learning to represent a multi-context environment: more than detecting changes. Frontiers in Psychology, 2012, 3: 228. [8]
138. Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 855–863. [8]
139. Reijenga, B. R., Close, R. A. Apparent timescaling of fossil diversification rates is caused by sampling bias. Current Biology, 2025, 35(4):905–910. DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2024.12.038. [6]
140. Reiter, R. On Closed World Data Bases. In: Gallaire H, Minker J (eds.), Logic and Data Bases. Plenum Press, 1978:55–76. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4684-3384-5_3. [6]
141. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical Conditioning II. [8]
142. Roever, C. Testing of second language pragmatics: past and future. Language Testing, 2011, 28(4): 463–481. [5]
143. Rommel, F., & Kasperan, R. L. (2022). Pluralism is not “anything goes” – grounding pluralism in economics in diverse economies by rehabilitating Paul Feyerabend. International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, 13(1), 43. [4]
144. Rosenthal, R. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 1979, 86:638–641. [6]
145. Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274(5294), 1926–1928. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.274.5294.1926 [1]
146. Sandoval-Lentisco, A. et al. Preregistration of Psychology Meta-Analyses: A Cross-Sectional Study of Prevalence and Practice. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2025, 8(1). DOI:10.1177/25152459241300113. [6]
147. Schellenberg, T. R. Modern Archives: Principles and Techniques. 1956. [9]
148. Schmidt, R. The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning. Applied Linguistics, 1990, 11(2):129–158. [9]
149. Schurz, A. Exploring the Potential of Extramural English in the Development of Implicit, Automatized, and Explicit Knowledge of Grammar. Language Learning, 76, 597–632, 2026. doi:10.1111/lang.70008. [7]
150. Searle, J. R. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, 1969. [5]
151. Segalowitz, N. Cognitive Bases of Second Language Fluency. Routledge, 2010. [7]
152. Serfaty, J. Maze tasks for L2 morphosyntactic skill acquisition. Language Teaching Research, OnlineFirst, 2026. doi:10.1177/13621688261422857. [7]
153. Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Markovich, A., Markus, A., & Bitan, T. (2025). Interbrain coupling during language learning contributes to learning outcomes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 20(1), nsaf045. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaf045 [1]
154. Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing II: Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84(2), 127–190. [2、3]
155. Silveira, N., Dozat, T., de Marneffe, M.-C., et al. A Gold Standard Dependency Corpus for English. English Web Treebank / Universal Dependencies. [6]
156. Simon, E. (2025). Second Language Phonology: Phonetic Variation and Phonological Representations. Cambridge University Press. [8]
157. Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2015). On the “holistic” nature of formulaic language. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. [4]
158. Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford University Press. [3]
159. Skehan, P. A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford University Press, 1998. [3]
160. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal Behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts. [1]
161. Slaats, S., Meyer, A. S., & Martin, A. E. (2026). More than words: Effects of grammaticality and lexical surprisal in self-paced reading. Cognition, 272, 106476. [4]
162. Sorace, A. Pinning down the concept of interface in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 1–33, 2011. [7]
163. Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., Wilson, D. Epistemic Vigilance. Mind & Language, 2010, 25(4):359–393. [9]
164. Starke, P., Zhang, Z., Papmeier, H., et al. Analysis of indications for selectively missing results in comparative registry-based studies in medicine: a meta-research study. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2025, 10:2. DOI:10.1186/s41073-025-00159-x. [6]
165. Sundara, M., & Breiss, C. (2026). The acquisition of native language phonotactics: Integrating insights from machine learning, and adult and infant experiments. Cognition, 273, 106525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106525. [4]
166. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in Second Language Acquisition. Newbury House. [1]
167. Swinney, D. A., & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90284-6. [4]
168. Tachihara, K., Goldberg, A. E. Learning Unacceptability: Repeated Exposure to Acceptable Sentences Improves Adult Learners’ Recognition of Unacceptable Sentences. Language Learning, 2025, 75:77–116. DOI:10.1111/lang.12660. [6]
169. Takizawa, K., et al. (2025). Automatized phonological vocabulary knowledge and second language speech fluency. Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaf042 [2]
170. Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action. MIT Press, 1994. [1]
171. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Harvard University Press. [1]
172. Tzeng, C. Y., Russell, M. L., Nygaard, L. C. Attention modulates perceptual learning of non-native-accented speech. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2024, 86(1):339–353. [9]
173. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drug Development Tools: Fit-for-Purpose Initiative. 2025. [9]
174. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Real-World Evidence. 2026. [9]
175. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Regulatory Science Framework. 2026. [9]
176. Uchihara, T., Karas, M., & Thomson, R. I. (2025). High variability phonetic training (HVPT): A meta-analysis of L2 perceptual training studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 47(3), 794–827. doi:10.1017/S0272263125100879. [8]
177. Ullman, M. T. The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: the declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2001, 4(1): 105–122. [2]
178. Universal Dependencies. Release 2.18 overview. 2026. https://universaldependencies.org/ [6]
179. Universal Dependencies. UD English EWT, Release 2.18, 2026-05-15. https://universaldependencies.org/treebanks/en_ewt/index.html [6]
180. VanPatten, B. Input Processing and Grammar Instruction in Second Language Acquisition. Ablex, 1996. [5]
181. VanderWeele, T. J. Explanation in Causal Inference: Methods for Mediation and Interaction. Oxford University Press, 2015. [2]
182. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Harvard University Press. [1]
183. Vygotsky, L. S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, 1978. [5]
184. Wang, et al. (2025). TaDiCodec: Single-Stage Speech Tokenization for Generative Speech Language Modeling. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 38. [2]
185. Wong, B. W. L., Samuel, A. G., Myers, E. B., & Kapnoula, E. C. (2026). Tracking Two Distributions at Once? Evidence from Bilingual Speech Perception. PsyArXiv/OSF preprint. doi:10.31234/osf.io/2jy4r. [8]
186. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x [1]
187. Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press. [4]
188. Wray, A. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press, 2002. [4]
189. Xiang, M., Wei, R., Chen, X. Entrenchment, preemption and related constraints in EFL dative overgeneralization. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2024. [6]
190. Xu, F., & Tenenbaum, J. B. Word learning as Bayesian inference. Psychological Review, 2007, 114(2): 245–272. [6、9]
191. Yan, X., et al. (2026). Shared neural geometries for bilingual semantic representations. Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2026.05.020 [2]
192. Yang, C. The Price of Linguistic Productivity: How Children Learn to Break the Rules of Language. MIT Press, 2016. [9]
193. Yang, Y., Chang, Y., Wen, Q., & Xu, Q. (2026). The effect of representational preference on second language lexical access in late bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, 1744494. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1744494 [2]
194. Zaharchuk, H. A., van Hell, J. G. The effects of exposure variability and similarity on talker-independent adaptation to Spanish-accented English. Journal of Memory and Language, online/2026 issue. [9]
195. Zappa, A., Bolger, D., Pergandi, J.-M., Fargier, R., Mestre, D., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (2024). The neural correlates of embodied L2 learning: Does embodied L2 verb learning affect representation and retention? Neurobiology of Language, 5(2), 360–384. [1]
196. Zhang, Y., Shi, Z., Liu, Y., & Guo, J. (2025). The facilitative mechanism of social interaction scenarios on second language vocabulary learning: evidence from near-infrared spectroscopy hyper-scanning. Cerebral Cortex, 35(4), bhaf070. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaf070 [1]
197. Zhao, L., et al. Inhibitory control of speech production in the human premotor frontal cortex. Nature Human Behaviour, 9, 971–986, 2025. doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02118-4. [7]
198. de Carvalho, A., Dautriche, I. Learning novel word meanings from explicit negative sentences. Cognition, 2025, 262:106171. [6]
199. van Aert, R. C. M. Meta-analyzing nonpreregistered and preregistered studies. Psychological Methods, 2025. DOI:10.1037/met0000719. [6]
200. 人机分工声明：本章的资料检索、结构整理、随机记录、形式化定义、文献核查与文稿排版由人工指令与AI辅助共同完成。所有新概念均以可撤回的研究假说处理；文中不把生成工具的内部过程作为学术证据。 [2]
201. 同题既有系列：证据源换手、无定载续态、语言差异释出、语言后代性、失误征募半径、后续约束继承、正确性去补贴化、生成可达域重构、求证路由内生化、路径新生、双熟互斥/共激活闭合、非单桥互操作、线索角色去别名化、知差悬修、成元余备等研究稿。 [9]
202. 学科来源的随机抽样与第一轮理论材料取自本书公开面板；前沿核验则使用可公开核验的原始论文、官方技术文件与出版平台。跨领域材料提供的是结构性约束，而不是把语言现象等同于密码系统、音频编码或基础设施。关于伪直连成功、桥必要率与非单桥互操作的经验地位，本章只主张“可被实验直接判决的理论对象”，不主张已由现有数据完成验证。公开双语数据复算仅用于淘汰过宽的时间成本判据。 [2]
203. 本章经典层占位检查另使用模型既有学术库存中的Wittgenstein（1953）语言游戏与Chomsky（1965）能力/表现区分；二者仅作概念占位对照，不作为本章新增经验数据。 [5]
204. 材料与证据边界说明 [2]
205. 王德生. 现代密码学·跨学科领域索引[EB/OL].跨学科领域索引, 2026-08. [2]
被三章以上共同引用的条目：0 条。