← 专著首页目录📄 在线 PDF⬇ 下载德麦国际专著第 92 号

参考书目

本表由本书十章各自原篇的文献表合并而成,按章分列。各章原文的引注编号为该篇原编号,与本表次序不对应。本书新写部分(枢纽章、合章、导论、结语、各附录)未新增文献,其中出现的一切理论对手均以类名指称而不点名到具体文献,理由见附录三第四条。

第1章原篇 秦莉《爱的他手性》(12 条)

· Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U., Fehr, E. (2005). Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature, 435, 673-676.

· LeDoux, J. E. (1996). The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life. New York: Simon Schuster.

· McGaugh, J. L. (2000). Memory: A century of consolidation. Science, 287(5451), 248-251.

· Nader, K., Schafe, G. E., LeDoux, J. E. (2000). Fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval. Nature, 406, 722-726.

· Ochsner, K. N., Gross, J. J. (2005). The cognitive control of emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(5), 242-249.

· Gottman, J. M., Gottman, J. S. (2017). The natural principles of love. Journal of Family Theory Review, 9(1), 7-26.

· LeDoux, J. E. (1996). The Emotional Brain. New York: Simon Schuster.

· Ochsner, K. N., Gross, J. J. (2005). The cognitive control of emotion. Trends Cogn. Sci., 9(5), 242-249.

· Kosfeld, M. et al. (2005). Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature, 435, 673-676.

· Gottman, J. M., Gottman, J. S. (2017). The natural principles of love. J. Fam. Theory Rev., 9(1), 7-26.

· 上一篇— 本组已到头 —下一篇剩余朝向:在爱的信念坍缩之后

· 三种读法 · 网页长文 · 在线 PDF 翻页 · PDF 下载

第2章原篇 刘言言《身份预支》(10 条)

· 布迪厄,皮埃尔(Bourdieu, Pierre),1994,《实践理性:论行动的理论》(Raisons pratiques: Sur la théorie de l'action),巴黎:Seuil出版社。

· 福柯,米歇尔(Foucault, Michel),1975,《规训与惩罚:监狱的诞生》(Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison),巴黎:Gallimard出版社。

· 戈夫曼,欧文(Goffman, Erving),1961,《收容所:论精神病人及其他收容者的社会处境》(Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates),纽约:Anchor Books/Doubleday出版社。

· 金耀基,2019,《从传统到现代》,北京:法律出版社。

· 李强,2016,《社会分层十讲》(第三版),北京:社会科学文献出版社。

· 卢曼,尼克拉斯(Luhmann, Niklas),1968,《信任:一个社会复杂性的简化机制》(Vertrauen: Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität),斯图加特:Enke出版社;第二版,1979,《信任与权力》(Trust and Power),奇切斯特:Wiley出版社。

· 费斯廷格,利昂(Festinger, Leon),1957,《认知失调理论》(A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance),斯坦福:斯坦福大学出版社。

· 郑功成,2018,《中国社会保障改革与发展战略:理念、目标与行动方案》,北京:人民出版社。

· 周其仁,2017,《改革的逻辑》,北京:中信出版社。

· 三种读法 · 网页长文 · 在线 PDF 翻页 · PDF 下载

第3章原篇 高鹏《权利的灰烬》(19 条)

· Derrida, Jacques (1995). Mal d'Archive: Une impression freudienne. Paris: Éditions Galilée.

· Foucault, Michel (1975). Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard.

· Heckman, James J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161.

· Luhmann, Niklas (1972). Rechtsoziologie. Reinbek: Rowohlt.

· Luhmann, Niklas (1984). Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

· Luhmann, Niklas (1993). Das Recht der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

· Manski, Charles F. (2003). Partial Identification of Probability Distributions. New York: Springer.

· Stoler, Ann Laura (2009). Along the Archival Grain: Epistemic Anxieties and Colonial Common Sense. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

· Trouillot, Michel-Rolph (1995). Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History. Boston: Beacon Press.

· Wald, Abraham (1943). A Method of Estimating Plane Vulnerability Based on Damage of Survivors. Statistical Research Group, Columbia University.

· Warren, Samuel D., Brandeis, Louis D. (1890). The Right to Privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4(5), 193–220.

· Weick, Karl E., Sutcliffe, Kathleen M. (2001). Managing the Unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

· Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153-161.

· Manski, C. F. (2003). Partial Identification of Probability Distributions. New York: Springer.

· Trouillot, M.-R. (1995). Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History. Boston: Beacon Press.

· Luhmann, N. (1993). Das Recht der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

· Warren, S. D., Brandeis, L. D. (1890). The Right to Privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4(5), 193-220.

· 日本行政指导史的年代据一九七三年石油危机后的石油价格卡特尔刑事案(公取委一九七四年起检控、东京高裁一九八〇年判决、最高裁一九八四年终审)与一九九三年《行政手続法》第三十二至三十六条(本次据以更正第七节两处年代)

· 三种读法 · 网页长文 · 在线 PDF 翻页 · PDF 下载

第4章原篇 张琼《社会学如何将存在感化约为不可说之物》(18 条)

· Baudrillard, J. (1981). Simulacres et Simulation. Paris: Galilée.

· Bourdieu, P. (1979). La distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.

· Bourdieu, P. (1992). Réponses: Pour une anthropologie réflexive. Paris: Seuil.

· Bourdieu, P. (1997). Méditations pascaliennes. Paris: Seuil.

· Butler, J. (1997). The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

· Butler, J. (2005). Giving an Account of Oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.

· Durkheim, É. (1895). Les Règles de la méthode sociologique. Paris: Félix Alcan.

· Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard.

· Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. C. Gordon (Ed.). New York: Pantheon Books.

· Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

· Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

· Latour, B., Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

· Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

· Marx, K. (1844). Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte. (First published 1932, Berlin: Marx-Engels-Gesamtausgabe).

· Mills, C. W. (1959). The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.

· Pippin, R. B. (2008). Hegel’s Practical Philosophy: Rational Agency as Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

· Weber, M. (1904–1905). Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 20–21. (Revised version published 1920).

· 三种读法 · 网页长文 · 在线 PDF 翻页 · PDF 下载

第5章原篇 王德生《被逐出的发生》(42 条)

· Barthes, R. (1968). La mort de l'auteur. Manteia, 5.

· Biesta, G. (2010). Good Education in an Age of Measurement: Ethics, Politics, Democracy. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

· Bourdieu, P. (1975). The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information, 14(6), 19-47.

· Fleck, L. (1935/1979). Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

· Foucault, M. (1969). Qu'est-ce qu'un auteur? Bulletin de la Société française de Philosophie, 63(3).

· Kristeva, J. (1969). Sèméiôtiké: Recherches pour une sémanalyse. Paris: Seuil.

· Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

· Lukács, G. (1923/1971). History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

· Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

· Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

· Bourdieu, P. (1984). Homo Academicus. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.

· Fleck, L. (1935). Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Basel: Benno Schwabe.

· Kristeva, J. (1969). Séméiotiké: Recherches pour une sémanalyse. Paris: Seuil.

· Lukács, G. (1923). Geschichte und Klassenbewusstsein. Berlin: Malik-Verlag.

· 本论文的机制已延伸为三篇实践文——只讲方法、技术与操作

· 企业结算改造:三层账本·未结清单·驻留小组·句式规则

· 同一个问题,九个方向轮番追问,把一个成见拆到承重的接缝。这双眼,你也可以借来一用——免费,浏览器直接用。

· 本文为依 SDE 发生学(王德生《SDE本体论》)重读经典的原创论述。下列文献为文中所涉思想的原典与代表性研究,供读者对读与查证;本文观点不代表所列作者立场。

· Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed (1970);中译《被压迫者教育学》,顾建新等译,华东师范大学出版社,2001(灌输式 vs 提问式教育)。

· Ivan Illich, Deschooling Society, New York: Harper & Row, 1971;中译《去学校化社会》,吴康宁译,台北桂冠,1994。

· Pierre Bourdieu & Jean-Claude Passeron, Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture, London: Sage, 1977(文化再生产)。

· Philip W. Jackson, Life in Classrooms, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1968(隐性课程)。

· Gert Biesta, The Beautiful Risk of Education, Boulder: Paradigm, 2014.

· John Dewey, Democracy and Education, New York: Macmillan, 1916;中译《民主主义与教育》,王承绪译,人民教育出版社,2001。

· Alfred North Whitehead, The Aims of Education and Other Essays, New York: Macmillan, 1929;中译《教育的目的》,庄莲平、王立中译,文汇出版社,2012。

· Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Émile, ou De l'éducation (1762);中译《爱弥儿》,李平沤译,商务印书馆,1978(消极教育)。

· John Dewey, Experience and Education, New York: Macmillan, 1938;中译《经验与教育》,姜文闵译,人民教育出版社,2005。

· Ken Robinson, "Do Schools Kill Creativity?", TED Talk, 2006;及 Out of Our Minds, Chichester: Capstone, 2011。

· Carol S. Dweck, Mindset: The New Psychology of Success, New York: Random House, 2006;中译《终身成长》,楚祎楠译,江西人民出版社,2017。

· Mihály Csíkszentmihályi, Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, New York: Harper & Row, 1990;中译《心流》,张定绮译,中信出版社,2017。

· Edward L. Deci & Richard M. Ryan, Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior, New York: Plenum, 1985(自我决定论)。

· Lev Vygotsky, Mind in Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978(最近发展区)。

· Jerome Bruner, The Process of Education, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960;中译《教育过程》,邵瑞珍译,文化教育出版社,1982。

· Jean Piaget, The Origins of Intelligence in Children, New York: International Universities Press, 1952;中译《儿童智慧的起源》,李其维译,华东师范大学出版社,2018。

· Maria Montessori, The Absorbent Mind (1949);中译《吸收性心智》,胡纯玉译,中国妇女出版社,2012。

· Howard Gardner, Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences, New York: Basic Books, 1983(多元智能)。

· Robert J. Sternberg, Beyond IQ: A Triarchic Theory of Human Intelligence, Cambridge University Press, 1985.

· Bruno Latour, We Have Never Been Modern, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993;中译《我们从未现代过》,刘鹏、安涅思译,苏州大学出版社,2010。

· 陶行知:《陶行知教育文集》,四川教育出版社,2005(生活即教育·教学做合一)。

· 孔子:《论语》,据杨伯峻《论语译注》,中华书局,1980(因材施教·不愤不启)。

· 本论文的新思想已延伸为三篇实践文——把原理落成可操作的方法、技术与步骤。

· © 德麦国际 Demai International · 导师师范文 · sdeuniverses.com

第6章原篇 陈晓艳《心理防卫为何会生产它所害怕的世界》(78 条)

· American Law Institute. Model Penal Code: Official Draft and Explanatory Notes. Section 3.04, Use of Force in Self-Protection. Philadelphia: American Law Institute; 1962.

· Brown v. United States, 256 U.S. 335 (1921).

· United States v. Peterson, 483 F.2d 1222 (D.C. Cir. 1973).

· Robinson PH. Causing the conditions of one’s own defense: a study in the limits of theory in criminal law doctrine. Virginia Law Review. 1985;71:1-63.

· Ferzan KK. Defending imminence: from battered women to Iraq. Arizona Law Review. 2004;46:213-262.

· Kaufman WRP. Self-defense, imminence, and the battered woman. New Criminal Law Review. 2007;10(3):342-369. doi:10.1525/nclr.2007.10.3.342.

· Manwaring J. Unnecessary self-defence. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2026;46(1):87-110. doi:10.1093/ojls/gqaf035.

· State v. Norman, 378 S.E.2d 8 (N.C. 1989).

· Kreider MR, Higuera PE, Parks SA, Rice WL, White N, Larson AJ. Fire suppression makes wildfires more severe and accentuates impacts of climate change and fuel accumulation. Nature Communications. 2024;15:2412. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46702-0.

· Kreider M. Scripts and data for “Fire suppression makes wildfires more severe and accentuates impacts of climate change and fuel accumulation”. Zenodo; 2024. doi:10.5281/zenodo.10729478.

· van Wagtendonk JW, Lutz JA. Fire regime attributes of wildland fires in Yosemite National Park, USA. Fire Ecology. 2007;3(2):34-52. doi:10.4996/fireecology.0302034.

· Rivera-Huerta H, Safford HD, Miller JD. Patterns and trends in burned area and fire severity from 1984 to 2010 in the Sierra de San Pedro Mártir, Baja California, Mexico. Fire Ecology. 2016;12:52-72. doi:10.4996/fireecology.1201052.

· Moritz MA, Batllori E, Bradstock RA, et al. Learning to coexist with wildfire. Nature. 2014;515(7525):58-66. doi:10.1038/nature13946.

· Calkin DE, Gebert KM, Jones JG, Neilson RP. Forest Service large fire area burned and suppression expenditure trends, 1970-2002. Journal of Forestry. 2005;103(4):179-183.

· Rothermel RC. A Mathematical Model for Predicting Fire Spread in Wildland Fuels. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-115. Ogden, UT: Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station; 1972.

· Bowlby J. Attachment and Loss. Vol. 1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books; 1969.

· Ainsworth MDS, Blehar MC, Waters E, Wall S. Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1978.

· Mikulincer M, Shaver PR. The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 2003;35:53-152. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(03)01002-5.

· Mikulincer M, Shaver PR, Pereg D. Attachment theory and affect regulation: the dynamics, development, and cognitive consequences of attachment-related strategies. Motivation and Emotion. 2003;27(2):77-102. doi:10.1023/A:1024515519160.

· Segal N, Fraley RC. Broadening the investment model: an intensive longitudinal study on attachment and perceived partner responsiveness in commitment dynamics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2016;33(5):581-599. doi:10.1177/0265407515584493.

· Peters BJ, Overall NC, Girme YU, Jamieson JP. Partners’ attachment insecurity predicts greater physiological threat in anticipation of attachment-relevant interactions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2019;36(2):469-489. doi:10.1177/0265407517734655.

· Fišerová A, Fiala V, Fayette D, Lindová J. The self-fulfilling prophecy of insecurity: mediation effects of conflict communication styles on the association between adult attachment and relationship adjustment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2021;38(4):1279-1302. doi:10.1177/0265407521988974.

· Kouri G, Messerli-Bürgy N, Meuwly N, Richter M, Schoebi D. Perceived partner responsiveness across the transition to parenthood: the role of attachment insecurity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2025. doi:10.1177/02654075251332725.

· Lefebvre AA, Brassard A, Jean M, Daspe MÈ, Lafontaine MF, Péloquin K. The role of communication in romantic attachment and relationship satisfaction: a dyadic longitudinal study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 2026;52:e70127. doi:10.1111/jmft.70127.

· Schrage KM, Impett EA, Topal MA, Harasymchuk C, Muise A. Novel and exciting or tried and true? Tailoring shared relationship experiences to insecurely attached partners. Social Psychological and Personality Science. Published online January 21, 2026. doi:10.1177/19485506251411438.

· Zhang S, Tao Y, Chen Y, Zhang P, Liu X. The effects of repeated attachment security priming on social anxiety and attention bias: a randomized controlled trial. Behavioral Sciences. 2023;13(5):420. doi:10.3390/bs13050420.

· Mowrer OH. On the dual nature of learning—a reinterpretation of “conditioning” and “problem-solving.” Harvard Educational Review. 1947;17:102-148.

· Solomon RL, Wynne LC. Traumatic avoidance learning: the principles of anxiety conservation and partial irreversibility. Psychological Review. 1954;61(6):353-385. doi:10.1037/h0054540.

· Salkovskis PM. The importance of behaviour in the maintenance of anxiety and panic: a cognitive account. Behavioural Psychotherapy. 1991;19(1):6-19. doi:10.1017/S0141347300011472.

· Salkovskis PM, Clark DM, Hackmann A, Wells A, Gelder MG. An experimental investigation of the role of safety-seeking behaviours in the maintenance of panic disorder with agoraphobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1999;37(6):559-574. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00153-3.

· Lovibond PF, Mitchell CJ, Minard E, Brady A, Menzies RG. Safety behaviours preserve threat beliefs: protection from extinction of human fear conditioning by an avoidance response. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2009;47(8):716-720. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2009.04.013.

· van Uijen SL, Dalmaijer ES, van den Hout MA, Engelhard IM. Do safety behaviors preserve threat expectancy? Journal of Experimental Psychopathology. 2018;9(4). doi:10.1177/2043808718804430.

· Meulders A, Van Daele T, Volders S, Vlaeyen JWS. The use of safety-seeking behavior in exposure-based treatments for fear and anxiety: benefit or burden? A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review. 2016;45:144-156. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2016.02.002.

· Milosevic I, Radomsky AS. Safety behaviour does not necessarily interfere with exposure therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2008;46(10):1111-1118. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2008.05.011.

· Wong AHK, Pittig A. Reducing avoidance of learnt fear: extinction of an imminent threat signal partly decreases costly avoidance to a distal threat signal. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology. 2023;14(2). doi:10.1177/20438087231175147.

· Merton RK. The self-fulfilling prophecy. The Antioch Review. 1948;8(2):193-210.

· Watzlawick P, Weakland JH, Fisch R. Change: Principles of Problem Formation and Problem Resolution. New York: W.W. Norton; 1974.

· Nickerson RS. Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology. 1998;2(2):175-220. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175.

· Hayes SC, Wilson KG, Gifford EV, Follette VM, Strosahl K. Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: a functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1996;64(6):1152-1168. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.64.6.1152.

· Wegner DM. Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review. 1994;101(1):34-52. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.34.

· Downey G, Feldman SI. Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1996;70(6):1327-1343. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1327.

· Downey G, Freitas AL, Michaelis B, Khouri H. The self-fulfilling prophecy in close relationships: rejection sensitivity and rejection by romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998;75(2):545-560. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.545.

· Downey G, Feldman S, Ayduk O. Rejection sensitivity and male violence in romantic relationships. Personal Relationships. 2000;7(1):45-61. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00003.x.

· Friston K. The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2010;11:127-138. doi:10.1038/nrn2787.

· Parr T, Pezzulo G, Friston KJ. Active Inference: The Free Energy Principle in Mind, Brain, and Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2022.

· Rubin DB. Inference and missing data. Biometrika. 1976;63(3):581-592. doi:10.1093/biomet/63.3.581.

· Hernán MA, Robins JM. Causal Inference: What If. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman Hall/CRC; 2020.

· Rachman S, Radomsky AS, Shafran R. Safety behaviour: a reconsideration. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2008;46(2):163-173. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2007.11.008.

· Wells A, Clark DM, Salkovskis P, Ludgate J, Hackmann A, Gelder M. Social phobia: the role of in-situation safety behaviors in maintaining anxiety and negative beliefs. Behavior Therapy. 1995;26(1):153-161. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80088-7.

· Hanahan D. Hallmarks of cancer: new dimensions. Cancer Discovery. 2022;12(1):31-46. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-1059.

· Craske MG, Treanor M, Conway CC, Zbozinek T, Vervliet B. Maximizing exposure therapy: an inhibitory learning approach. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2014;58:10-23. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2014.04.006.

· Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic Data Analysis. New York: Guilford Press; 2006.

· Bolger N, Laurenceau JP. Intensive Longitudinal Methods: An Introduction to Diary and Experience Sampling Research. New York: Guilford Press; 2013.

· Heitjan DF, Rubin DB. Ignorability and coarse data. The Annals of Statistics. 1991;19(4):2244-2253. doi:10.1214/aos/1176348396.

· Frangakis CE, Rubin DB. Principal stratification in causal inference. Biometrics. 2002;58(1):21-29. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00021.x.

· Zhang JL, Rubin DB. Estimation of causal effects via principal stratification when some outcomes are truncated by “death.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 2003;28(4):353-368. doi:10.3102/10769986028004353.

· Hudgens MG, Halloran ME. Toward causal inference with interference. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2008;103(482):832-842. doi:10.1198/016214508000000292.

· 在收集资料前声明研究只涉及低风险、可撤回事件;列出暴力、胁迫、跟踪、自伤、重大医疗和财产风险等无条件排除项。

· 为每一类事件预定义合格起点G、区分性结果、tᴏ、动作字典、通道关闭C和最大观察窗。

· 保护结局P与证据结局R必须分开编码;未成证事件只表示结果未生成,不得编码为“本来安全”、错失机会或主体认知错误。

· U以全部合格起点为分母;低分母、普通缺失、无法判断和退出研究必须单列。

· 机会账、动作账、结果账和外部危险账尽可能由不同来源测量;不得用一份回忆问卷循环生成全部字段。

· 只观察完成事件时,p、s₁与s₀不可识别;禁止由完成样本推断真实威胁率或反例断代,必须先恢复机会分母。

· 防卫频率、焦虑、依恋、拒绝敏感性和关系满意度均不能替代U,也不能作为人格诊断。

· 反例断代候选必须依次观察选择性未完成、完成样本偏斜、下一触发前移和U再次上升;缺一环即退回局部术语。

· 因果升级需窗口干预与证据反馈两段均通过;U在全部合格起点上估计,威胁结局仅作主分层或界限分析,不比较被干预选择出的完成者。

· 真实危险、对方侵害、权力不对称和制度救济失败必须作为优先竞争解释;不得以主体防卫解释施害者责任。

· 不把火灾管理的“允许低强度火”翻译为要求人忍受轻微伤害;不把法律案件翻译为心理责任。

· 心理防卫、思想癌化与组织癌化均为结构隐喻,不是精神障碍或恶性肿瘤诊断。

· 不声称创伤、思想、依恋、人格、压力或情绪直接导致躯体癌症,不据此给出筛查、治疗或预后建议。

· 报告不利证据:Wong—Pittig复算的平均差为正,但22/53个体同向,未过55%门槛;不得只摘显著p值。

· 火灾复算只支持模拟选择过滤;不得把40个模拟重复称为40个现实生态系统,更不得当作人体证据。

· 任何干预保留随时退出权;若降低U需要增加危险、取消边界或强迫暴露,研究立即停止。

· 模型须与粗化资料、主分层、单位间干扰、安全行为、确认偏误、自证预言、依恋、主动推断和真实关系恶化正面比较。

· 若成熟模型不需要许可门槛、强度依赖截断和他者回写字段即可产生相同事件级预测与干预排序,删除“反例断代”独立名称。

· 个体资料只用于事件审计,不用于保险、就业、司法能力、监护、伴侣归责或临床资源资格。

· 到2034年未获得跨场景联合记录与双重安全干预证据,按正文删除条款撤销机制主张。

· © 德麦国际 · SDE Universes · 作者 陈晓艳

第7章原篇 胡敏《感知剥脱》(7 条)

· Armstrong, D. (1995). The rise of surveillance medicine. Sociology of Health Illness, 17(3), 393–404.

· Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Trans. M. Ritter. London: Sage Publications.

· Fridén, T., Roberts, D., Ageberg, E., Waldén, M., Zätterström, R. (2001). Review of knee proprioception and the relation to extremity function after an anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Journal of Orthopaedic Sports Physical Therapy, 31(10), 567–576.

· Kapreli, E., Athanasopoulos, S., Gliatis, J., Papathanasiou, M., Peeters, R., Strimpakos, N., Sunaert, S. (2009). Anterior cruciate ligament deficiency causes brain plasticity: a functional MRI study. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 37(12), 2419–2426.

· Paterno, M. V., Schmitt, L. C., Ford, K. R., Rauh, M. J., Myer, G. D., Huang, B., Hewett, T. E. (2010). Biomechanical measures during landing and postural stability predict second anterior cruciate ligament injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and return to sport. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 38(10), 1968–1978.

· Wright, R. W., Magnussen, R. A., Dunn, W. R., Spindler, K. P. (2007). Ipsilateral graft and contralateral ACL rupture at five years or more following ACL reconstruction: a systematic review. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 89(6), 1165–1171.

· 三种读法 · 网页长文 · 在线 PDF 翻页 · PDF 下载

第8章原篇 高于涵《道德程序的装配与感知回路的切除》(18 条)

· 班固(约82年),《汉书》。本文据中华书局1962年点校本。

· 董仲舒(约前135年),《春秋繁露》。本文据苏舆《春秋繁露义证》,中华书局,1992年。

· Eisenstadt, S. N. (1963). The Political Systems of Empires. New York: The Free Press.

· 范晔(约445年),《后汉书》。本文据中华书局1965年点校本。

· Foucault, Michel. (1975). Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard.

· Foucault, Michel. (1983). Discours et vérité: précédé de La parrêsia. Paris: Vrin.(1983年加州大学伯克利分校讲座,中文本参见《说真话的勇气》,上海人民出版社,2018年。)

· Gramsci, Antonio. (1948). Quaderni del carcere. Torino: Einaudi.

· 刘义庆(约430年),《世说新语》。本文参考余嘉锡《世说新语笺疏》,中华书局,2007年。

· Marx, Karl. (1844/1932). Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte aus dem Jahre 1844.(写于1844年,1932年首次全文出版。)

· 孟轲(约前300年),《孟子》。本文据焦循《孟子正义》,中华书局,1987年。

· 睡虎地秦墓竹简整理小组(1978),《睡虎地秦墓竹简》。文物出版社。

· Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. (1988). “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg (eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

· Weber, Max. (1905). Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus.(原载《社会科学和社会政策文库》,1904—1905年。)

· 余英时(2003),《朱熹的历史世界:宋代士大夫政治文化的研究》。台北:允晨文化。(另有三联书店2011年简体字版。)

· Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 证言不正义与解释学不正义之分,及后者“无加害者”的结构定性。

· Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press. 可读性工程与地方性实践知识的系统删除。

· Eisenstadt, S. N. (1963). The Political Systems of Empires. New York: Free Press. 原稿已引,此处并列备考。

· 三种读法 · 网页长文 · 在线 PDF 翻页 · PDF 下载

第9章原篇 少敏《作品不能保存全部原创性》(24 条)

· Alós-Ferrer, C., Granic, G. D. (2023). Does choice change preferences? An incentivized test of the mere choice effect. Experimental Economics, 26(3), 499–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-021-09728-5

· Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997–1013. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997

· Ananth, P., Harvey, S. (2023). Ideas in the space between: Stockpiling and processes for managing ideas in developing a creative portfolio. Administrative Science Quarterly, 68(2), 465–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392231154909

· Biderman, N., Shohamy, D. (2021). Memory and decision making interact to shape the value of unchosen options. Nature Communications, 12, 4648. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24907-x

· Boden, M. A. (1998). Creativity and artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 103(1–2), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(98)00055-1

· Boorman, E. D., Behrens, T. E. J., Rushworth, M. F. S. (2011). Counterfactual choice and learning in a neural network centered on human lateral frontopolar cortex. PLoS Biology, 9(6), e1001093. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001093

· Brod, G., Holstein, E., Weindorf, L., Colantonio, J., Bonawitz, E., Theobald, M. (2025). Do it yourself: Discerning the effects of self-directed activity on conceptual learning. npj Science of Learning, 10, 70. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00364-9

· De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9

· De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E., Gallagher, S. (2010). Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(10), 441–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.009

· Doshi, A. R., Hauser, O. P. (2024). Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content. Science Advances, 10(28), eadn5290. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adn5290

· Gureckis, T. M., Markant, D. B. (2012). Self-directed learning: A cognitive and computational perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612454304

· Laland, K., Odling-Smee, J., Endler, J. (2017). Niche construction, sources of selection and trait coevolution. Interface Focus, 7(5), 20160147. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2016.0147

· Laran, J., Wilcox, K. (2011). Choice, rejection, and elaboration on preference-inconsistent alternatives. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(2), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1086/659040

· Luan, Y. L., Kim, Y. J., Zhou, J. (2025). Augmented learning for joint creativity in human–GenAI co-creation. Information Systems Research, Articles in Advance. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2024.0984

· Moruzzi, C., Margarido, S. (2024). A user-centered framework for human-AI co-creativity. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts (pp. 1–9). https://doi.org/10.1145/3613905.3650929

· Parikh, D. (2020). Predicting a creator’s preferences in, and from, interactive generative art. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computational Creativity. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2003.01274

· Shen, H., Shen, L., Wu, W., Zhang, K. (2025). IdeationWeb: Tracking the evolution of design ideas in human-AI co-creation. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–19). https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713375

· Shivaswamy, P., Joachims, T. (2015). Coactive learning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 53, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.4539

· Smith, A., Anderson, B. R., Otto, J. T., Karth, I., Sun, Y., Chung, J. J. Y., Roemmele, M., Kreminski, M. (2025). Fuzzy linkography: Automatic graphical summarization of creative activity traces. In Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Creativity and Cognition (pp. 637–650). https://doi.org/10.1145/3698061.3726915

· Sprangers, M. A. G., Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science Medicine, 48(11), 1507–1515. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00045-3

· Tucker, A. D., Brantley, K., Cahall, A., Joachims, T. (2024). Coactive learning for large language models using implicit user feedback. In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning (Vol. 235, pp. 48809–48822). https://proceedings.mlr.press/v235/tucker24a.html

· Urai, A. E., de Gee, J. W., Tsetsos, K., Donner, T. H. (2019). Choice history biases subsequent evidence accumulation. eLife, 8, e46331. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46331

· Vaccaro, M., Almaatouq, A., Malone, T. W. (2024). When combinations of humans and AI are useful: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 8, 2293–2303. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02024-1

· Vergne, J.-P., Durand, R. (2010). The missing link between the theory and empirics of path dependence: Conceptual clarification, testability issue, and methodological implications. Journal of Management Studies, 47(4), 736–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00913.x

第10章原篇 胡志英《刀与伤口同源》(17 条)

· Bergson, H. (1907) L'évolution créatrice. Paris: Félix Alcan.

· Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

· Gödel, K. (1931) “Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I.” Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik, 38, 173–198.

· Heidegger, M. (1927) Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.

· Kant, I. (1781/1787) Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Riga: Hartknoch.

· Newton, I. (1687) Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica. London.

· Piaget, J. (1937) La construction du réel chez l'enfant. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.

· Swidler, A. (1986) “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273–286.

· Whitehead, A. N. (1929) Process and Reality. New York: Macmillan.

· Wittgenstein, L. (1953) Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.

· Wittgenstein, L. (1969) On Certainty. Oxford: Blackwell.

· Niklas Luhmann, Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft, Suhrkamp, 1990.

· George Spencer-Brown, Laws of Form, Allen Unwin, 1969.

· Thomas Nagel, The View from Nowhere, Oxford University Press, 1986.

· Ludwig Wittgenstein, Über Gewissheit / On Certainty, Basil Blackwell, 1969.

· Kurt Gödel, “Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I,” Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik, 38, 1931.

· 三种读法 · 网页长文 · 在线 PDF 翻页 · PDF 下载

© 德麦国际出版社 · 王德生 + Claude《谁来陪伴我?》