作 品 发 表 · PUBLISHED WORKS
PUBLISHED WORKS

阳涌 · 作品

Yang Yong · Works

SDE 学员 · 英语语言文学硕士 · AI 时代意义困境三篇
SDE trainee · MA in English · three papers on the AI-age crisis of meaning
之五 · AI 时代学术知识生产V · Academic Knowledge Production

强制的撤销:AI时代学术知识生产中的认知社会化危机

The Revocation of Compulsion: The Crisis of Cognitive Socialization in AI-Era Knowledge Production

维系学术判断力代际传递的,曾是一个强制每个进入者穿过的环节——在批评的熔炉里让判断被反复淬炼。当 AI 使它可被制度性绕过,危机不再是"社会化失败",而是人被社会化进了一个不再要求那项最硬能力的共同体。本文与波兰尼、布雷弗曼、柯林斯、拉夫-温格对质。

What sustained the intergenerational transmission of scholarly judgment was a compulsory passage — having one\u2019s judgment tempered in the crucible of criticism. When AI lets that passage be institutionally bypassed, the crisis is no longer failed socialization but being socialized into a community that no longer demands the hardest capacity.

约 2.1 万字 · 三种读法 · 发表于2026年7月22日
~21,000 chars · 3 modes · July 22, 2026
之四 · AI 时代物理学的认知生态IV · The Cognitive Ecology of Physics

理论私欲的发生条件及其当代隐退

Theoretical Appetite: The Conditions of Its Genesis and Its Contemporary Retreat

驱动伽利略把望远镜指向月球的,不只是对假说的检验,还有一种近乎偏执、愿在证据未足时就孤注一掷押上自己的投入——"理论私欲"。当大科学体制叠加 AI 中介逐一抹平它的着床条件,理论生产的原创性会以程序上无可挑剔的方式枯竭。本文与韦伯、波兰尼、布迪厄、默顿逐一对质。

What drove Galileo was not only hypothesis-testing but a near-obsessive willingness to stake himself before the evidence sufficed — "theoretical appetite." As big science and AI mediation smooth away its conditions, originality withers in a procedurally impeccable way.

约 2.2 万字 · 三种读法 · 发表于2026年7月22日
~22,000 chars · 3 modes · July 22, 2026
之三 · AI 时代的意义发生学III · A Genetic Analysis of Meaning

意义的外包与回收:AI 时代幸福悖论的一个发生学分析

The Outsourcing and Reclamation of Meaning: A Genetic Analysis of the AI-Age Happiness Paradox

把含混耐受、错误重铸、意愿生成三者不可拆解的耦合命名为“意义胃”。“空心”或许不是心理疾病,而是这套耦合机制在长期外包中的功能停滞——不是被挫败(习得性无助),而是从未被需要。出路不是加强外部供给,而是有意识地重建让意义胃重新运转的条件。

Naming the inseparable coupling of ambiguity-tolerance, error-recasting and volition-generation the meaning-stomach. The hollow feeling may be not a disease but this coupling's functional stagnation under long outsourcing — not defeated (learned helplessness) but never needed.

约 2.2 万字 · 三种读法 · 发表于2026年7月14日
~22,000 chars · 3 modes · July 14, 2026
之二 · AI 时代的意义先验批判II · A Transcendental Critique of Meaning

价值闭合:AI 时代“无法启动的意义”的一个先验批判

Value Closure: A Transcendental Critique of Meaning That Cannot Start in the AI Age

主流的“能力停滞论”(卡尔、特克尔)暗藏一个未审的预设——存在一个先在的、完整的“意愿主体”。本文逮住这个预设:困扰当代人的不是意义器官的萎缩,而是“谁在思考、谁在困惑”那个“我”的发生过程,被一种叫“价值闭合”的环境结构在起点处抹掉了。

The mainstream capability-stagnation thesis hides an unexamined premise — a pre-existing, complete willing subject. This paper catches it: the affliction is not an atrophied organ of meaning, but that the genesis of the I is erased at its origin by an environmental structure named value closure.

约 2.0 万字 · 三种读法 · 发表于2026年7月14日
~20,000 chars · 3 modes · July 14, 2026
之一 · AI 时代的元伦理困境I · A Meta-Ethical Predicament

伦理的失重:当完美他者截断了责任的回路

Ethical Weightlessness: When the Perfect Other Severs the Loop of Responsibility

把“误差”从认知信号重构为伦理互认的共振频率:当 AI 以永不误解、永不出错,替代了人与他者之间充满摩擦、必须为自己的理解负责的脆弱互动,责任得以挂靠的那个内在着力点被平滑地溶解了。这就是“伦理失重”。

Reframing error from a cognitive signal into the resonant frequency of ethical mutual-recognition: when AI's flawless understanding replaces the fragile, friction-laden interaction in which one must answer for one's grasp of the other, the foothold to which responsibility attaches dissolves.

约 2.3 万字 · 三种读法 · 发表于2026年7月14日
~23,000 chars · 3 modes · July 14, 2026
← 返回阳涌 Profile← Back to Yang Yong's profile